I have not used any Medium Format on my Z7 and Z9 but I regularly use all 4 of my Canon T/S on Nikon and Sony bodies when shooting landscape and architecture, i really love those Canon T/S lenses, they all work great with the Fringer adapter, the mirrorless body from Sony, Canon, Nikon really gave new life to those awesome lenses and now I am using them as my " universal" lens on all 3 platforms, while those EF T/S lens are not cheap but I still save tons of moneys by using one set of lenses on 3 different platforms, my friend even adapted them on his GFX100s. And I think they have dual axis capability (which only the Nikon 19mm has). If you an find a medium format lens that short it is probably a modern lens and will cost you as much as a Nikon or Canon T/S.Ĭanon T/S lenses are a little cheaper than Nikon. But if you want to go as wide as Nikon's 19mm T/S or Canon's 17mm T/S your are probably out of luck. So if you don't want to shoot any wider than 35mm, a medium format lens and T/S adapter will work really great. putting a 35mm medium format lens (which is really wide angle on medium format) on a full frame camera body is still going to act like a 35mm full frame lens. However, the size of the negative or sensor is going to change the effective field of view. The lens itself has the same field of view regardless of what camera you put it on. Keep in mind that a 35mm lens on a medium format film camera is really wide angle, similar to using a 20mm lens in full frame. Limitations? Older medium format lenses are not available in wide focal lengths (in 35mm camera terms). That's a fine option if you can live with the focal length limitations. Thank you for any thoughts you can offer. Finally, read in this tread how some have added the 2nd moveable axis to the older Nikon PC-E lenses with the use of a tilt adapter. Have also read that adapting Canon T/S lenses onto Nikon Z is another good option. I do not own any MF lenses yet and have read that Mamiya, Pentax and Hasselblad all work well. Is there are change in perspective when adapting MF to 35mm? Does a 24mm adapted MF lens have the same field of view as a native 24mm lens? I'm thinking about picking up a used medium format lens and adapting it to a Nikon Z using the Fotodiox TLT ROKR (or something similar). And while I have gotten some good results stitching images together and fixing perspective in post, I'd really rather be shooting that processing images. However, $3.3k is a little rich for me as I am a hobbyist. ![]() I had access to a Nikon 19mm PC-E for a little while and loved, loved, loved it. I posted this in another thread, but thought I'd ask the question here too. Have found some great info, but nothing as specific as what I am asking. I apologize if these questions are redundant.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |